Colliding black holes: how far can the close approximation go?
Reinaldo Gleiser, Oscar Nicasio, Richard Price, Jorge Pullin

TL;DR
This paper advances the understanding of black hole collisions by applying second-order perturbation theory, improving waveform accuracy and establishing the method's validity range for gravitational wave modeling.
Contribution
It introduces second-order perturbation theory to better model black hole collisions, providing error estimates and enhancing the utility of perturbation methods for gravitational wave research.
Findings
Second-order results align more closely with numerical simulations.
Perturbation theory's validity range is clarified.
Provides benchmarks for numerical relativity and waveform templates.
Abstract
We study the head-on collision of two equal-mass momentarily stationary black holes, using black hole perturbation theory up to second order. Compared to first-order results, this significantly improves agreement with numerically computed waveforms and energy. Much more important, second-order results correctly indicate the range of validity of perturbation theory. This use of second-order, to provide ``error bars,'' makes perturbation theory a viable tool for providing benchmarks for numerical relativity in more generic collisions and, in some range of collision parameters, for supplying waveform templates for gravitational wave detection.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
