Is the $ISO(2,1)$ Gauge Gravity equivalent to the Metric Formulation?
Jin-Ho Cho, Hyuk-jae Lee

TL;DR
This paper investigates the quantization of the gravitational Chern-Simons coefficient in $ISO(2,1)$ gauge gravity, revealing its inequivalence to the metric formulation and resolving related paradoxes.
Contribution
It demonstrates the inequivalence between $ISO(2,1)$ gauge gravity and the metric formulation, clarifying the conditions under which the Chern-Simons coefficient is quantized.
Findings
Quantization of the Chern-Simons coefficient in both Lorentzian and Euclidean schemes.
Resolution of paradoxes related to gauge gravity quantization.
Evidence that induced spin is not exotic in this context.
Abstract
The quantization of the gravitational Chern-Simons coefficient is investigated in the framework of gauge gravity. Some paradoxes involved are cured. The resolution is largely based on the inequivalence of gauge gravity and the metric formulation. Both the Lorentzian scheme and the Euclidean scheme lead to the coefficient quantization, which means that the induced spin is not quite exotic in this context.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Statistical and numerical algorithms · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
