Invalidity of the relativity principle and a proposal of the twofold metric principle
Kosaburo Hashiguchi

TL;DR
This paper challenges the validity of the relativity principle, proposing a twofold metric principle that modifies the understanding of inertial systems, and derives several classical results using this new framework.
Contribution
It introduces the twofold metric principle as an alternative to the relativity principle, providing new derivations of key physical phenomena.
Findings
All inertial systems are not equivalent.
The Lorentz transformation is not the space-time transformation for inertial systems.
Derivation of the twofold Schwarzschild metric and planetary orbits.
Abstract
I show that all inertial systems are not equivalent, and the Lorentz transformation is not the space-time transformation over two inertial systems moving with relative constant velocity. To do this, I consider imaginary signals travelling over any inertial system K with arbitrarily large velocities. The travelling of an imaginary signal over K is just a time lapse over K. Then I present an example to show that all coordinate systems are not equivalent when the related theory is restricted over tensor-based coordinate transformations, i.e., the genereal relativity principle is not valid. Instead of the relativity principle, I propose the twofold metric principle which may be roughly stated to assert that the set of equations H(v) describing the motion of a material body with velocity v> 0 can be obtained from the corresponding set of equations H(0) for velocity v=0 by replacing, in each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Advanced Differential Geometry Research · Mathematics and Applications
