An Iterative Approach to Twisting and Diverging, Type N, Vacuum Einstein Equations: A (Third-Order) Resolution of Stephani's `Paradox'
J. D. Finley, III (Univ. of New Mexico), J. F. Pleba\'nski (CINVESTAV, del IPN, Mexico, D. F.), Maciej Przanowski (Technical University, \L\'od\'z,, Poland)

TL;DR
This paper resolves a long-standing paradox in vacuum Einstein equations by demonstrating that third-order perturbative solutions can be regular, challenging previous claims that such solutions are inherently singular and cannot model gravitational waves.
Contribution
The authors introduce a third-order iterative method to find regular solutions to twisting, type-N vacuum Einstein equations, overturning prior assumptions about their singularity.
Findings
Third-order perturbations yield regular solutions
Solutions become flat before losing twisting
Challenges previous claims about solution singularities
Abstract
In 1993, a proof was published, within ``Classical and Quantum Gravity,'' that there are no regular solutions to the {\it linearized} version of the twisting, type-N, vacuum solutions of the Einstein field equations. While this proof is certainly correct, we show that the conclusions drawn from that fact were unwarranted, namely that this irregularity caused such solutions not to be able to truly describe pure gravitational waves. In this article, we resolve the paradox---since such first-order solutions must always have singular lines in space for all sufficiently large values of ---by showing that if we perturbatively iterate the solution up to the third order in small quantities, there are acceptable regular solutions. That these solutions become flat before they become non-twisting tells us something interesting concerning the general behavior of solutions describing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
