Observation of the Final Boundary Condition: Extragalactic Background Radiation and the Time symmetry of the Universe
David A. Craig (University of Alberta)

TL;DR
This paper explores how a closed, time-symmetric universe could produce a significantly higher extragalactic background radiation than observed, offering a potential test for the universe's boundary conditions and challenging the notion of time symmetry.
Contribution
It demonstrates that in a closed universe with time symmetric boundary conditions, the optical extragalactic background radiation would be at least twice the contribution from observed galaxies, providing a testable prediction.
Findings
Time symmetric boundary conditions imply higher EGBR levels.
Electromagnetic radiation can propagate unabsorbed into the recollapsing phase.
Current observations are consistent with the lower bound of the predicted excess EGBR.
Abstract
This paper examines an observable consequence for the diffuse extragalactic background radiation (EGBR) of the hypothesis that if closed, our universe possesses time symmetric boundary conditions. For simplicity, attention is focused on optical wavelengths. The universe is modeled as closed Friedmann- Roberston-Walker. It is shown that, over a wide range of frequencies, electromagnetic radiation can propagate largely unabsorbed from the present epoch into the recollapsing phase, confirming and demonstrating the generality of results of Davies and Twamley. As a consequence, time symmetric boundary conditions imply that the optical EGBR is at least twice that due to the galaxies on our past light cone, and possibly considerably more. It is therefore possible to test experimentally the notion that if our universe is closed, it may be in a certain sense time symmetric. The lower bound on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
