New constraints for canonical general relativity
Michael Reisenberger

TL;DR
This paper investigates the invariance properties of Ashtekar's canonical formulation of general relativity, introduces a new fully 4-diffeomorphism invariant theory with stronger constraints, and discusses implications for quantum loop gravity.
Contribution
It derives a new canonical formulation of GR from Plebanski's action that is fully 4-diffeomorphism invariant and explores its classical and quantum implications.
Findings
Ashtekar's theory is invariant under infinitesimal 4-diffeomorphisms but not under some finite ones when the dreibein is degenerate.
A new invariant theory has stronger constraints, allowing flux loop births and deaths.
Implications for quantum GR include finite amplitudes for loop creation and annihilation, affecting the loop representation.
Abstract
Ashtekar's canonical theory of classical complex Euclidean GR (no Lorentzian reality conditions) is found to be invariant under the full algebra of infinitesimal 4-diffeomorphisms, but non-invariant under some finite proper 4-diffeos when the densitized dreibein, , is degenerate. The breakdown of 4-diffeo invariance appears to be due to the inability of the Ashtekar Hamiltonian to generate births and deaths of flux loops (leaving open the possibility that a new `causality condition' forbidding the birth of flux loops might justify the non-invariance of the theory). A fully 4-diffeo invariant canonical theory in Ashtekar's variables, derived from Plebanski's action, is found to have constraints that are stronger than Ashtekar's for . The corresponding Hamiltonian generates births and deaths of flux loops. It is argued that this implies a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
