Counterexample to the passive topological censorship of K(pi,1) prime factors
Gregory A. Burnett

TL;DR
This paper presents a counterexample in general relativity showing that certain topological features of spacetime are not hidden from observers, challenging previous assumptions about topological censorship.
Contribution
It provides a specific counterexample to the passive topological censorship conjecture for K(pi,1) prime factors in asymptotically flat spacetimes.
Findings
Counterexample spacetime with non-negative energy density
Demonstrates not all topological features are passively censored
Contradicts previous topological censorship arguments
Abstract
A globally hyperbolic asymptotically flat spacetime is presented (having non-negative energy density and pressures) that shows that not all K(pi,1) prime factors of the Cauchy surface topology are passively censored according to asymptotic observers in contradiction to an argument of Friedman, Schleich, and Witt.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
