A comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for Computing the Entropy of Stationary Black Holes
Vivek Iyer, Robert M. Wald

TL;DR
This paper compares various methods for calculating the entropy of stationary black holes, showing they agree within their applicable domains and generalizing Brown and York's quasilocal energy for broader theories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods, highlighting their applicability and limitations, and extends the definition of quasilocal energy to more general gravity theories.
Findings
All methods agree within their domains of applicability.
Approaches have specific restrictions on the theories they can handle.
The paper generalizes Brown and York's quasilocal energy to broader theories.
Abstract
The entropy of stationary black holes has recently been calculated by a number of different approaches. Here we compare the Noether charge approach (defined for any diffeomorphism invariant Lagrangian theory) with various Euclidean methods, specifically, (i) the microcanonical ensemble approach of Brown and York, (ii) the closely related approach of Ba\~nados, Teitelboim, and Zanelli which ultimately expresses black hole entropy in terms of the Hilbert action surface term, (iii) another formula of Ba\~nados, Teitelboim and Zanelli (also used by Susskind and Uglum) which views black hole entropy as conjugate to a conical deficit angle, and (iv) the pair creation approach of Garfinkle, Giddings, and Strominger. All of these approaches have a more restrictive domain of applicability than the Noether charge approach. Specifically, approaches (i) and (ii) appear to be restricted to a class…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
