A Neglected Route to Realism About Quantum Mechanics

TL;DR

This paper explores advanced action in quantum mechanics, arguing it can resolve conflicts with relativity and is less counterintuitive than traditionally thought, by examining causal asymmetry and objective causation.

Contribution

It demonstrates that quantum mechanics can incorporate advanced action without conflict, challenging conventional views and providing new insights into causality and realism.

Findings

Advanced action evades standard objections in QM.

It aligns with special relativity.

Causal asymmetry is largely anthropocentric.

Abstract

Bell's Theorem assumes that hidden variables are not influenced by future measurement settings. The assumption has sometimes been questioned, but the suggestion has been thought outlandish, even by the taxed standards of the discipline. (Bell thought that it led to fatalism.) The case for this reaction turns out to be surprisingly weak, however. We show that QM easily evades the standard objections to advanced action. And the approach has striking advantages, especially in avoiding the apparent conflict between Bell's Theorem and special relativity. The second part of the paper considers the broader question as to why advanced action seems so counterintuitive. We investigate the origins of our ordinary intuitions about causal asymmetry. It is argued that the view that the past does not depend on the future is largely anthropocentric, a kind of projection of our own temporal asymmetry. Many physicists have also reached this conclusion, but have thought that if causation has no objective direction, there is no objective content to an advanced action interpretation of QM. This turns out to be a mistake. From the ordinary subjective perspective, we can distinguish two sorts of objective world: one "looks as if" it contains only forward causation, the other ``looks as if'' it involves a mix of backward and forward causation. This clarifies the objective core of an advanced action interpretation of QM, and shows that there is an independent symmetry argument in favour of the approach.