The Relation between Physical and Gravitational Geometry
Jacob D. Bekenstein (University of California at Santa Barbara and, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between physical and gravitational geometries, proposing that if the physical geometry is Finslerian, it must reduce to a Riemannian form related by a generalized conformal transformation.
Contribution
It demonstrates that under the weak equivalence principle and causality, Finslerian physical geometries must simplify to Riemannian geometries related through a generalized conformal transformation.
Findings
Finslerian geometries reduce to Riemannian geometries under physical constraints
Physical metric relates to gravitational metric via generalized conformal transformation
Supports the universality of Riemannian geometry in gravitational theories
Abstract
The appearance of two geometries in one and the same gravitational theory is familiar. Usually, as in the Brans-Dicke theory or in string theory, these are conformally related Riemannian geometries. Is this the most general relation between the two geometries allowed by physics ? We study this question by supposing that the physical geometry on which matter dynamics take place could be Finslerian rather than just Riemannian. An appeal to the weak equivalence principle and causality then leads us the conclusion that the Finsler geometry has to reduce to a Riemann geometry whose metric - the physical metric - is related to the gravitational metric by a generalization of the conformal transformation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
