Are moving punctures equivalent to moving black holes?
Jonathan Thornburg, Peter Diener, Denis Pollney, Luciano Rezzolla,, Erik Schnetter, Ed Seidel, and Ryoji Takahashi

TL;DR
This paper compares two numerical techniques for simulating binary black-hole systems, demonstrating that the moving-punctures method produces results equivalent to the traditional excision method, thus validating its correctness.
Contribution
The study provides evidence that the moving-punctures technique is equivalent to excision in evolving binary black-hole spacetimes, supporting its validity in numerical relativity.
Findings
Both methods produce identical invariants along the chosen worldline.
Moving-punctures and excision yield the same spacetimes in the causal past.
The results support the correctness of the moving-punctures approach.
Abstract
When simulating the inspiral and coalescence of a binary black-hole system, special care needs to be taken in handling the singularities. Two main techniques are used in numerical-relativity simulations: A first and more traditional one ``excises'' a spatial neighbourhood of the singularity from the numerical grid on each spacelike hypersurface. A second and more recent one, instead, begins with a ``puncture'' solution and then evolves the full 3-metric, including the singular point. In the continuum limit, excision is justified by the light-cone structure of the Einstein equations and, in practice, can give accurate numerical solutions when suitable discretizations are used. However, because the field variables are non-differentiable at the puncture, there is no proof that the moving-punctures technique is correct, particularly in the discrete case. To investigate this question we use…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
