Learning about compact binary merger: the interplay between numerical relativity and gravitational-wave astronomy
Thomas Baumgarte, Patrick Brady, Jolien D E Creighton, Luis Lehner,, Frans Pretorius, Ricky DeVoe

TL;DR
This paper explores how numerical relativity waveforms can be integrated into gravitational-wave data analysis, assessing their accuracy, sensitivity to errors, and implications for detecting and interpreting signals from black hole mergers.
Contribution
It introduces measures for waveform accuracy, estimates the number of templates needed for detection, and discusses systematic errors and computational costs in numerical simulations.
Findings
Approximately 100 templates are needed for detection with initial LIGO.
Sensitivity of data analysis to waveform errors is quantified.
Systematic errors and computational costs are estimated for future simulations.
Abstract
Activities in data analysis and numerical simulation of gravitational waves have to date largely proceeded independently. In this work we study how waveforms obtained from numerical simulations could be effectively used within the data analysis effort to search for gravitational waves from black hole binaries. We propose measures to quantify the accuracy of numerical waveforms for the purpose of data analysis and study how sensitive the analysis is to errors in the waveforms. We estimate that ~100 templates (and ~10 simulations with different mass ratios) are needed to detect waves from non-spinning binary black holes with total masses in the range 100 Msun < M < 400 Msun using initial LIGO. Of course, many more simulation runs will be needed to confirm that the correct physics is captured in the numerical evolutions. From this perspective, we also discuss sources of systematic errors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
