Consistency of post-Newtonian waveforms with numerical relativity
John G. Baker, James R. van Meter, Sean T. McWilliams, Joan Centrella,, Bernard J. Kelly

TL;DR
This paper compares post-Newtonian waveforms with numerical relativity simulations for binary black hole inspirals, finding good agreement up to the last orbit before merger, thus validating PN approximations in this regime.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of late-inspiral waveforms from numerical relativity with high-order post-Newtonian predictions, confirming their consistency.
Findings
PN waveforms agree with numerical simulations until last orbit
Validation of PN approximations for late-inspiral phase
Waveform phasing matches within error estimates
Abstract
General relativity predicts the gravitational wave signatures of coalescing binary black holes. Explicit waveform predictions for such systems, required for optimal analysis of observational data, have so far been achieved using the post-Newtonian (PN) approximation. The quality of this treatment is unclear, however, for the important late-inspiral portion. We derive late-inspiral waveforms via a complementary approach, direct numerical simulation of Einstein's equations. We compare waveform phasing from simulations of the last cycles of gravitational radiation from equal-mass, nonspinning black holes with the corresponding 2.5PN, 3PN, and 3.5PN orbital phasing. We find phasing agreement consistent with internal error estimates based on either approach, suggesting that PN waveforms for this system are effective until the last orbit prior to final merger.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
