There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History
Gavriel Segre

TL;DR
This paper explores the logical consistency of temporal logics that allow for changes in history, challenging the need for a Chronology Protection Agency to prevent paradoxes.
Contribution
It demonstrates the existence of consistent temporal logics that admit historical changes, providing a new perspective on the safety of logical frameworks for time.
Findings
Existence of consistent temporal logics with history-changing capabilities
Logical safety for logicians without a Chronology Protection Agency
Challenges to Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture
Abstract
Introducing his Chronology Protection Conjecture Stephen Hawking said that it seems that there exists a Chronology Protection Agency making the Universe safe for historians. Without taking sides about such a conjecture we show that the Chronology Protection Agency is not necessary in order to make the Universe unsafe for historians but safe for logicians.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
