TL;DR
This paper clarifies a misinterpretation in a hep-th posting, emphasizing the importance of accurate referencing and commentary in scientific discussions.
Contribution
It highlights the necessity for precise communication and correction of errors in scientific commentaries and postings.
Findings
The hep-th posting was erroneous in claiming to comment on the author's note.
The author clarifies the actual relationship between the posting and their note.
Emphasizes the importance of accurate scientific discourse.
Abstract
The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies · Mathematics and Applications · Analytic Number Theory Research