The search for continuous gravitational waves: metric of the multi-detector F-statistic
Reinhard Prix

TL;DR
This paper develops a formalism for the parameter-space metric of the multi-detector F-statistic used in continuous gravitational wave searches, showing how detector combination affects computational efficiency and search sensitivity.
Contribution
It introduces a family of F-statistic metrics parametrized by unknown amplitudes, and demonstrates that combining similar sensitivity detectors is computationally advantageous for wide-parameter searches.
Findings
The multi-detector metric can be expressed via noise-weighted averages of single-detector metrics.
Combining detectors of similar sensitivity is more cost-effective than longer observation times.
The metric predictions align with measured mismatches, with identified regimes where local metrics fail.
Abstract
We develop a general formalism for the parameter-space metric of the multi-detector F-statistic, which is a matched-filtering detection statistic for continuous gravitational waves. We find that there exists a whole family of F-statistic metrics, parametrized by the (unknown) amplitude parameters of the gravitational wave. The multi-detector metric is shown to be expressible in terms of noise-weighted averages of single-detector contributions, which implies that the number of templates required to cover the parameter space does not scale with the number of detectors. Contrary to using a longer observation time, combining detectors of similar sensitivity is therefore the computationally cheapest way to improve the sensitivity of coherent wide-parameter searches for continuous gravitational waves. We explicitly compute the F-statistic metric family for signals from isolated spinning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
