(SC)RMI: A (S)emi-(C)lassical (R)elativistic (M)otion (I)integrator, to model the orbits of space probes around the Earth and other planets
S. Pireaux (Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, Department ARTEMIS,, Grasse, France), J-P. Barriot (Observatoire Midi-Pyrenees, UMR 5562-DTP,, Toulouse, France), P. Rosenblatt (Observatoire Royal de Belgique, Bruxelles,, Belgique)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a semi-classical relativistic motion integrator for accurately modeling spacecraft orbits within General Relativity, improving precision over classical methods by directly integrating relativistic equations.
Contribution
It presents a novel numerical integrator based on relativistic equations of motion, incorporating perturbations and ensuring proper velocity norm conservation.
Findings
Accurately models spacecraft orbits using relativistic equations.
Maintains proper velocity norm with symplectic integrator.
Bridges classical and relativistic orbital modeling.
Abstract
Today, the motion of spacecrafts is still described according to the classical Newtonian equations plus the so-called "relativistic corrections", computed with the required precision using the Post-(Post-)Newtonian formalism. The current approach, with the increase of tracking precision (Ka-Band Doppler, interplanetary lasers) and clock stabilities (atomic fountains) is reaching its limits in terms of complexity, and is furthermore error prone. In the appropriate framework of General Relativity, we study a method to numerically integrate the native relativistic equations of motion for a weak gravitational field, also taking into account small non-gravitational forces. The latter are treated as perturbations, in the sense that we assume that both the local structure of space-time is not modified by these forces, and that the unperturbed satellite motion follows the geodesics of the local…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
