Why Eppley and Hannah's Experiment Isn't
James Mattingly

TL;DR
This paper critiques Eppley and Hannah's thought experiment, arguing it is fundamentally flawed, unfeasible to build, and would collapse into a black hole, thus invalidating their conclusion that gravity must be quantized.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis showing the flaws and physical impossibility of Eppley and Hannah's proposed experiment to prove gravity's quantization.
Findings
The proposed device cannot be constructed with known physics.
The device would be so massive it would form a black hole.
The experiment's assumptions are physically implausible.
Abstract
It is shown that Eppley and Hannah's thought experiment establishing that gravity must be quantized is fatally flawed. The device they propose, even if built, cannot establish their claims, nor is it plausible that it can be built with any materials compatible with the values of c, h, and G. Finally the device, and any reasonable modification of it, would be so massive as to be within its own Schwarzschild radius--a fatal flaw for any thought experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
