
TL;DR
This paper critically examines a proposed alternative to dark matter in explaining galactic rotation curves and argues that such models are fundamentally flawed and cannot succeed.
Contribution
The paper provides a critical analysis showing that models claiming to explain galactic rotation without dark matter are inherently unviable.
Findings
Proposed models cannot account for observed rotation curves.
Dark matter remains necessary for explaining galactic dynamics.
Alternative models are fundamentally flawed.
Abstract
Cooperstock and Tieu have proposed a model to account for galactic rotation curves without invoking dark matter. I argue that no model of this type can work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
