Critical Tests for two Hypotheses used in Gravitation and Cosmology
R. A. Vera

TL;DR
This paper presents critical tests challenging traditional hypotheses in gravitation, proposing a non-local relativity theory consistent with quantum mechanics and supported by astronomical observations.
Contribution
It introduces a new cosmological model and tests that oppose traditional assumptions, aligning with quantum mechanics and observational data.
Findings
Relative properties of nonlocal bodies depend on G potential differences.
G energy derives from a fraction of the bodies' mass-energy, not the field.
The proposed non-local relativity aligns with quantum mechanics and astronomical observations.
Abstract
From more critical tests for gravitational (G) hypotheses it has been proved that the relative properties of nonlocal (NL) bodies at rest with respect to an observer depend on the difference of G potential between bodies and observer. The G energy comes not from the field but from a fraction of the mass-energy of the bodies. These results are in opposition with two traditional hypotheses used in Physics. In the classical tests of general relativity their errors are compensated because they have the same absolute value and opposite signs. The general theory based on such tests, called non-local relativity, is consistent with quantum mechanics and with all of the traditional G tests. The new cosmological scenario, which is radically different from the standard one, has also been verified from astronomical observations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
