
TL;DR
This paper examines how certain assumptions in physics and quantum cosmology, once thought fundamental, are actually context-dependent and may be discarded to develop more general theories of the universe.
Contribution
It analyzes historical and current examples of excess baggage in cosmology and quantum mechanics, proposing that some foundational ideas are contextually limited and may be reconsidered.
Findings
Historical examples show assumptions once considered fundamental were discarded
Current quantum cosmology assumptions may also be excess baggage
Identifies potential future assumptions that could be reconsidered
Abstract
Many advances in physics have in common that some idea which was previously accepted as fundamental, general, and inescapable was subsequently seen to be consequent, special, and dispensable. The idea was not truly a general feature of the world, but only perceived to be general because of our special place in the universe and the limited range of our experience. It was excess baggage which had to be jettisoned to reach a more a more general perspective. This article discusses excess baggage from the perspective of quantum cosmology which aims at a theory of the universe's quantum initial state. We seek to answer the question `Which features of our current theoretical framework are fundamental and which reflect our special position in the universe or its special initial condition?' Past instances of cosmological excess baggage are reviewed such as the idea that the Earth was at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
