Gravitational waves from oscillating accretion tori: Comparison between different approaches
Alessandro Nagar (Torino&Valencia), Jose A. Font (Valencia), Olindo, Zanotti (Valencia), Roberto De Pietri (Parma)

TL;DR
This paper compares gravitational waveforms from oscillating accretion tori computed via the quadrupole formula and gauge-invariant metric perturbation theory, revealing conditions for their agreement and limitations.
Contribution
It introduces a relativistic modification of the quadrupole formula and assesses its accuracy against perturbative methods for accretion disk gravitational waves.
Findings
No excitation of black hole quasi-normal modes in stable disks
Relativistic quadrupole formula agrees well with perturbative results when back-scattering is negligible
Quadrupole formula errors are around 10% when back-scattering effects are significant
Abstract
Quasi-periodic oscillations of high density thick accretion disks orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole have been recently addressed as interesting sources of gravitational waves. The aim of this paper is to compare the gravitational waveforms emitted from these sources when computed using (variations of) the standard quadrupole formula and gauge-invariant metric perturbation theory. To this goal we evolve representative disk models using an existing general relativistic hydrodynamics code which has been previously employed in investigations of such astrophysical systems. Two are the main results of this work: First, for stable and marginally stable disks, no excitation of the black hole quasi-normal modes is found. Secondly, we provide a simple, relativistic modification of the Newtonian quadrupole formula which, in certain regimes, yields excellent agreement with the perturbative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
