False discovery rate: setting the probability of false claim of detection
L. Baggio, G. A. Prodi

TL;DR
This paper discusses the false discovery rate method as a way to control the probability of false claims in multiple hypothesis testing, especially relevant for gravitational wave surveys, balancing detection power and error control.
Contribution
It reviews the false discovery rate approach and its application to gravitational wave surveys, highlighting its role in managing false positives in multiple testing scenarios.
Findings
False discovery rate controls the proportion of false positives.
Application to gravitational wave surveys improves detection reliability.
Balances confidence levels with detection power.
Abstract
When testing multiple hypothesis in a survey --e.g. many different source locations, template waveforms, and so on-- the final result consists in a set of confidence intervals, each one at a desired confidence level. But the probability that at least one of these intervals does not cover the true value increases with the number of trials. With a sufficiently large array of confidence intervals, one can be sure that at least one is missing the true value. In particular, the probability of false claim of detection becomes not negligible. In order to compensate for this, one should increase the confidence level, at the price of a reduced detection power. False discovery rate control is a relatively new statistical procedure that bounds the number of mistakes made when performing multiple hypothesis tests. We shall review this method, discussing exercise applications to the field of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
