Comments on the paper by S. Samuel "On the speed of gravity and the Jupiter/Quasar measurement"
Sergei M. Kopeikin (University of Missouri-Columbia)

TL;DR
This paper critiques Samuel's review on the speed of gravity, clarifying the correct relativistic principles of light propagation in gravitational fields and highlighting conceptual errors in Samuel's interpretation.
Contribution
It provides a clear, Lorentz-invariant derivation of the relativistic time delay and corrects misconceptions about the speed of gravity versus the speed of light.
Findings
Clarifies the correct relativistic time delay expression.
Identifies and explains errors in Samuel's theory.
Emphasizes the distinction between the speed of gravity and light.
Abstract
Recent review article by S. Samuel "On the speed of gravity and the Jupiter/Quasar measurement" published in the International Journal of Modern Physics D13, 1753 (2004) provides the reader with a misleading "theory" of the relativistic time delay in general theory of relativity. Furthermore, it misquotes original publications by Kopeikin and Fomalont & Kopeikin related to the measurement of the speed of gravity by VLBI. We summarize the general relativistic principles of the Lorentz-invariant theory of propagation of light in time-dependent gravitational field, derive Lorentz-invariant expression for the relativistic time delay, and finally explain why Samuel's "theory" is conceptually incorrect and confuses the speed of gravity with the speed of light.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
