Black holes: a prediction of theory or phantasy?
A.A.Logunov, M.A.Mestverishvili, V.V.Kiselev
TL;DR
This paper questions whether black holes are a necessary outcome of general relativity, suggesting they may be more speculative than established facts.
Contribution
It challenges the conventional view that black holes are a direct prediction of general relativity, proposing alternative interpretations.
Findings
Black holes may not be a strict consequence of general relativity
Alternative explanations for phenomena attributed to black holes
Reevaluation of black hole evidence and theory
Abstract
We argue for black holes do not represent a strict consequence of general relativity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Biofield Effects and Biophysics