
TL;DR
This paper reviews experimental constraints on scalar-tensor gravity theories from solar-system tests, binary pulsars, and cosmological data, highlighting how these observations limit model features and can distinguish between different theories.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how various experimental and observational tests constrain scalar-tensor theories, offering insights into their viability and ways to differentiate models.
Findings
Solar-system experiments tightly constrain matter-scalar coupling derivatives.
Binary-pulsar tests impose bounds on gravitational wave emission predictions.
Cosmological observations help reconstruct scalar field functions with some uncertainties.
Abstract
The best motivated alternatives to general relativity are scalar-tensor theories, in which the gravitational interaction is mediated by one or several scalar fields together with the usual graviton. The analysis of their various experimental constraints allows us to understand better which features of the models have actually been tested, and to suggest new observations able to discriminate between them. This talk reviews three classes of constraints on such theories, which are qualitatively different from each other: (i) solar-system experiments; (ii) binary-pulsar tests and future detections of gravitational waves from inspiralling binaries; (iii) cosmological observations. While classes (i) and (ii) impose precise bounds respectively on the first and second derivatives of the matter-scalar coupling function, (iii) a priori allows us to reconstruct the full shapes of the functions of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
