A review of conventional explanations of anomalous observations during solar eclipses
Chris P. Duif

TL;DR
This paper critically reviews conventional explanations for anomalous mechanical and gravitational observations during solar eclipses, finding that they fail to account for the phenomena and suggesting directions for future research.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive critique of existing explanations for eclipse-related anomalies and highlights the need for alternative approaches.
Findings
Conventional explanations fail to account for observed anomalies.
Tilt of the vertical may influence measurements.
Recent gravimeter data do not support traditional theories.
Abstract
Conventional explanations for observations of anomalous behaviour of mechanical systems during solar eclipses are critically reviewed. These observations include the work of Allais with paraconical pendula, those of Saxl and Allen with a torsion pendulum and measurements with gravimeters. Attempts of replications of these experiments and recent gravimeter results are discussed and unpublished data by Latham and by Saxl et al. is presented. Some of the data are summarized and re-analyzed. Especially, attention is paid to observations of tilt of the vertical, which seems to play an important role in this matter and recommendations for future research are given. It is concluded that all the proposed conventional explanations either qualitatively or quantitatively fail to explain the observations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
