Scalar--Field Amplitudes in Black--Hole Evaporation
A.N.St.J.Farley, P.D.D'Eath (Department of Applied Mathematics and, Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge)

TL;DR
This paper calculates quantum amplitudes for black hole decay into flat space and radiation, showing no information loss and using complexified time to solve boundary-value problems in a semi-classical framework.
Contribution
It introduces a method to evaluate quantum amplitudes for black hole evaporation using complex time and boundary data, extending previous approaches to include scalar fields and supersymmetric theories.
Findings
Quantum amplitudes are approximately exp(-I), with I being the classical Euclidean action.
The boundary-value problem becomes well-posed with complexified time T, enabling unique solutions.
The approach applies to weak scalar fields and confirms no information loss in black hole decay.
Abstract
We study the quantum-mechanical decay of a Schwarzschild-like black hole into almost-flat space and weak radiation at a very late time, evaluating quantum amplitudes (not just probabilities) for transitions from initial to final states. No information is lost. The model contains gravity and a massless scalar field. The quantum amplitude to go from given initial to final bosonic data in a slightly complexified time-interval at infinity is approximately , where is the (complex) Euclidean action of the classical solution filling in between the boundary data. And in a locally supersymmetric (supergravity) theory, the amplitude const. exp(-I) is exact. Dirichlet boundary data for gravity and the scalar field are posed on an initial spacelike hypersurface extending to spatial infinity, just prior to collapse, and on a corresponding final spacelike…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
