Particles and vacuum for perturbative and non-perturbative Einstein-Rosen gravity
J. Fernando Barbero G., Guillermo A. Mena Marugan, and Eduardo J. S., Villase\~nor

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between two quantum descriptions of Einstein-Rosen waves, revealing their fundamental differences and showing that standard perturbative methods cannot be applied due to unitarily inequivalent Fock spaces.
Contribution
It establishes a connection between Ashtekar and Pierri's non-linear quantization and the linearized perturbative approach, highlighting the non-analyticity of the perturbative vacuum.
Findings
The gauge used by Ashtekar and Pierri generalizes the de Donder gauge to full cylindrical gravity.
The relation between the two approaches involves a highly non-linear field redefinition.
The perturbative vacuum cannot be obtained as a limit of the Ashtekar-Pierri vacuum due to infinite norm corrections.
Abstract
We discuss the connection between the Fock space introduced by Ashtekar and Pierri for Einstein-Rosen waves and its perturbative counterpart based on the concept of particle that arises in linearized gravity with a de Donder gauge. We show that the gauge adopted by Ashtekar and Pierri is a generalization of the de Donder gauge to full (i.e. non-linearized) cylindrical gravity. This fact allows us to relate the two descriptions of the Einstein-Rosen waves analyzed here by means of a simple field redefinition. Employing this redefinition, we find the highly non-linear relation that exists between the annihilation and creation-like variables of the two approaches. We next represent the particle-like variables of the perturbative approach as regularized operators, introducing a cut-off. These can be expanded in powers of the annihilation and creation operators of the Ashtekar and Pierri…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
