Causal paradoxes: a conflict between relativity and the arrow of time
H. Nikolic

TL;DR
This paper discusses how causal paradoxes in relativity arise from confusing the relativistic coordinate time with the thermodynamic arrow of time, proposing that the latter resolves these paradoxes.
Contribution
It clarifies that the true physical arrow of time is thermodynamic, not relativistic, resolving apparent causal paradoxes in relativity.
Findings
Causal paradoxes result from misidentifying the time arrow.
Thermodynamic arrow of time is absolute and irrotational.
Relativistic coordinate time does not define causality.
Abstract
It is often argued that superluminal velocities and nontrivial spacetime topologies, allowed by the theory of relativity, may lead to causal paradoxes. By emphasizing that the notion of causality assumes the existence of a time arrow (TA) that points from the past to the future, the apparent paradoxes appear to be an artefact of the wrong tacit assumption that the relativistic coordinate TA coincides with the physical TA. The latter should be identified with the thermodynamic TA, which, by being absolute and irrotational, does not lead to paradoxes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
