Operational indistinguishably of varying speed of light theories
Nosratollah Jafari, Ahmad Shariati

TL;DR
This paper examines two varying speed of light theories and demonstrates that they are essentially re-descriptions of Einstein's special relativity, not new theories.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that these theories do not extend or modify relativity but are equivalent reformulations.
Findings
Theories are mathematically equivalent to special relativity
They do not introduce new physical principles
Varying speed of light does not lead to new predictions
Abstract
The varying speed of light theories have been recently proposed to solve the standard model problems and anomalies in the ultra high energy cosmic rays. These theories try to formulate a new relativity with no assumptions about the constancy of the light speed. In this regard, we study two theories and want to show that these theories are not the new theories of relativity, but only re-descriptions of Einstein's special relativity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
