TL;DR
This paper discusses the implications of an infinite universe, suggesting that paradoxes can be resolved with a realistic view of individual lives and questioning the simulation hypothesis.
Contribution
It offers a new perspective on infinite universe paradoxes and critically examines the idea of our universe as a computer simulation.
Findings
Paradoxes in infinite universes can be alleviated with a realistic definition of lives.
The notion of our universe as a simulation is critically questioned.
Abstract
We argue that whether the universe is infinite or finite is less crucial than usually supposed. Paradoxes of repeating behaviour in the infinite, or eternal inflationary, universe can be alleviated by a realistic definition of differing lives. We also critically question the notion that our universe could simply be a simulation in somebody else's computer.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.