Toward standard testbeds for numerical relativity
Miguel Alcubierre, Gabrielle Allen, Carles Bona, David Fiske, Tom, Goodale, F. Siddharta Guzman, Ian Hawke, Scott H. Hawley, Sascha Husa,, Michael Koppitz, Christiane Lechner, Denis Pollney, David Rideout, Marcelo, Salgado, Erik Schnetter, Edward Seidel, Hisa-aki Shinkai

TL;DR
This paper advocates for standardized testbeds in numerical relativity to systematically compare different evolution schemes, aiming to identify strengths, weaknesses, and sources of discrepancies in simulations of Einstein's equations.
Contribution
It introduces the concept and initial design of standardized testbeds for numerical relativity, facilitating fair comparison and analysis of various approaches.
Findings
Initial simple tests demonstrate effectiveness in revealing approach limitations.
Testbeds can distinguish differences caused by formulations, gauges, and boundary conditions.
Designed to be accessible and applicable to various numerical relativity methods.
Abstract
In recent years, many different numerical evolution schemes for Einstein's equations have been proposed to address stability and accuracy problems that have plagued the numerical relativity community for decades. Some of these approaches have been tested on different spacetimes, and conclusions have been drawn based on these tests. However, differences in results originate from many sources, including not only formulations of the equations, but also gauges, boundary conditions, numerical methods, and so on. We propose to build up a suite of standardized testbeds for comparing approaches to the numerical evolution of Einstein's equations that are designed to both probe their strengths and weaknesses and to separate out different effects, and their causes, seen in the results. We discuss general design principles of suitable testbeds, and we present an initial round of simple tests with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
