
TL;DR
The paper critically examines the theoretical basis of black hole radiation, highlighting unresolved issues and the need for quantum gravity insights, while considering the possibility of non-radiating mini black holes as dark matter candidates.
Contribution
It reviews the assumptions behind black hole radiation predictions and discusses the challenges and uncertainties, emphasizing the need for quantum gravity to resolve these issues.
Findings
Current theories rely on dubious assumptions.
Quantum gravitational effects may alter black hole evaporation.
Mini black holes could be dark matter candidates.
Abstract
The prediction that black holes radiate due to quantum effects is often considered one of the most secure in quantum field theory in curved space-time. Yet this prediction rests on two dubious assumptions: that ordinary physics may be applied to vacuum fluctuations at energy scales increasing exponentially without bound; and that quantum-gravitational effects may be neglected. Various suggestions have been put forward to address these issues: that they might be explained away by lessons from sonic black hole models; that the prediction is indeed successfully reproduced by quantum gravity; that the success of the link provided by the prediction between black holes and thermodynamics justifies the prediction. This paper explains the nature of the difficulties, and reviews the proposals that have been put forward to deal with them. None of the proposals put forward can so far be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
