Relativity theory of clocks and rulers
Marek Pawlowski (Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland)

TL;DR
This paper derives special relativity kinematics from intuitive assumptions without using light signals, introducing equivalence classes of clocks and rulers, and identifies Lorentz, Galilean, and Euclidean cases.
Contribution
It presents a novel derivation of Lorentz kinematics based on equivalence classes of measurement devices, avoiding the traditional reliance on light signals.
Findings
Lorentz kinematics emerges from simple assumptions
Three generic cases identified: Lorentz, Galilean, Euclidean
Lorentz case characterized by maximal relative speed
Abstract
Special Relativity (SR) kinematics is derived from very intuitive assumptions. Contrary to standard Einstein's derivation, no light signal is used in the construction nor it is assumed to exist. Instead we postulate the existence of two equivalence classes of physical objects: proportional clocks and proportional rulers. Simple considerations lead to Lorentz kinematics as one of three generic cases. The Lorentz case is characterized by the maximal relative speed of physical objects. The two others are the Galilean and the Euclidean cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Geophysics and Sensor Technology · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
