Twilight for the energy conditions?
Carlos Barcelo (Portsmouth, UK), Matt Visser (Washington University, in Saint Louis)

TL;DR
This paper discusses the fundamental conflicts between quantum physics and general relativity, highlighting issues with classical energy conditions and their implications for the consistency of physical theories.
Contribution
It critically examines the limitations of classical energy conditions in general relativity in light of quantum and semi-classical phenomena, questioning their validity.
Findings
Classical energy conditions face fundamental problems at semi-classical levels.
Certain classical systems inspired by quantum physics show pathological behaviour.
Addressing these issues may require radical revisions of gravitational theory.
Abstract
The tension, if not outright inconsistency, between quantum physics and general relativity is one of the great problems facing physics at the turn of the millennium. Most often, the problems arising in merging Einstein gravity and quantum physics are viewed as Planck scale issues (10^{19} GeV, 10^{-34} m, 10^{-45} s), and so safely beyond the reach of experiment. However, over the last few years it has become increasingly obvious that the difficulties are more widespread: There are already serious problems of deep and fundamental principle at the semi-classical level, and worse, certain classical systems (inspired by quantum physics, but in no sense quantum themselves) exhibit seriously pathological behaviour. One manifestation of these pathologies is in the so-called ``energy conditions'' of general relativity. Patching things up in the gravity sector opens gaping holes elsewhere; and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
