The quantum physics of chronology protection
Matt Visser (Washington University in Saint Louis)

TL;DR
This paper reviews the current understanding of Stephen Hawking's conjecture that fundamental physics prevents the formation of time machines, discussing examples of spacetimes with closed causal curves and the community's reactions.
Contribution
It provides a survey of the theoretical and conceptual status of chronology protection, highlighting the mechanisms and debates surrounding the prevention of closed timelike curves.
Findings
Examples of spacetimes with closed causal curves are examined.
Theoretical arguments for and against chronology protection are discussed.
The community's reactions to potential time machine scenarios are summarized.
Abstract
This is a brief survey of the current status of Stephen Hawking's ``chronology protection conjecture''. That is: ``Why does nature abhor a time machine?'' I'll discuss a few examples of spacetimes containing ``time machines'' (closed causal curves), the sorts of peculiarities that arise, and the reactions of the physics community. While pointing out other possibilities, this article concentrates on the possibility of ``chronology protection''. As Stephen puts it: ``It seems that there is a Chronology Protection Agency which prevents the appearance of closed timelike curves and so makes the universe safe for historians.''
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
