Uncertainty in Measurements of Distance
John C. Baez, S. Jay Olson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that by attaching a measuring device to a massive elastic rod, it is possible to measure distances with uncertainty below previously established bounds, highlighting the role of relativistic and quantum effects.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel measurement setup using a massive elastic rod to surpass prior bounds on distance measurement uncertainty.
Findings
Uncertainty bound is at least the Planck length L_P.
Relativistic rigidity limits prevent surpassing the bound without additional mechanisms.
Zero-point fluctuations of the rod set a fundamental limit on measurement precision.
Abstract
Ng and van Dam have argued that quantum theory and general relativity give a lower bound of L^{1/3} L_P^{2/3} on the uncertainty of any distance, where L is the distance to be measured and L_P is the Planck length. Their idea is roughly that to minimize the position uncertainty of a freely falling measuring device one must increase its mass, but if its mass becomes too large it will collapse to form a black hole. Here we show that one can go below the Ng-van Dam bound by attaching the measuring device to a massive elastic rod. Relativistic limitations on the rod's rigidity, together with the constraint that its length exceeds its Schwarzschild radius, imply that zero-point fluctuations of the rod give an uncertainty greater than or equal to L_P.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
