A Possible Test for Quadratic Gravity in $d \ge 4$ dimensions
Janusz Garecki

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Einsteinian strengths and degrees of freedom in quadratic gravity theories across dimensions, highlighting differences between metric and torsion-admitting models in terms of their theoretical robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of Einsteinian strengths and degrees of freedom for quadratic gravity theories, emphasizing the distinction between metric-only and torsion-inclusive models.
Findings
Purely metric quadratic gravity is stronger in Einsteinian sense.
Quadratic gravity theories with torsion are less robust.
The analysis provides insights into testing quadratic gravity in higher dimensions.
Abstract
In this letter we consider the Einsteinian strengths and dynamical degrees of freedom for quadratic gravity. We show that purely metric quadratic gravity theories are much stronger in Einsteinian sense than the competitive quadratic gravity theories which admit torsion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
