Numerical Tests of Evolution Systems, Gauge Conditions, and Boundary Conditions for 1D Colliding Gravitational Plane Waves
J. M. Bardeen, L. T. Buchman

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how different formulations, gauge choices, boundary conditions, and numerical methods affect the accuracy and stability of 1D colliding gravitational wave simulations using hyperbolic schemes within a first-order 3+1 Einstein equations framework.
Contribution
It systematically compares hyperbolic formulations and boundary conditions, demonstrating their impact on simulation stability and accuracy in numerical relativity.
Findings
Hyperbolic schemes outperform ADM in stability.
Physically correct boundary conditions require ingoing eigenmodes.
Second-order accurate numerical methods are effective for smooth solutions.
Abstract
We investigate how the accuracy and stability of numerical relativity simulations of 1D colliding plane waves depends on choices of equation formulations, gauge conditions, boundary conditions, and numerical methods, all in the context of a first-order 3+1 approach to the Einstein equations, with basic variables some combination of first derivatives of the spatial metric and components of the extrinsic curvature tensor. Hyperbolic schemes, specifically variations on schemes proposed by Bona and Masso and Anderson and York, are compared with variations of the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner formulation. Modifications of the three basic schemes include raising one index in the metric derivative and extrinsic curvature variables and adding a multiple of the energy constraint to the extrinsic curvature evolution equations. Redundant variables in the Bona-Masso formulation may be reset frequently or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
