Observed threshold anomalies as the first hope of a manifestation of Planck-length physics
Giovanni Amelino-Camelia

TL;DR
This paper discusses threshold anomalies in high-energy astrophysical observations as potential signs of quantum-gravity effects, emphasizing the importance of phenomenological models and how combined data can differentiate between various quantum-gravity scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for testing quantum-gravity theories using astrophysical threshold anomalies and gamma-ray burst data, comparing different models including space-time foam, non-commutative space-time, and a minimum-length relativistic theory.
Findings
Threshold anomalies may indicate quantum-gravity effects.
Combining threshold data with gamma-ray burst timing can distinguish models.
Phenomenological models are now competing with other new-physics proposals.
Abstract
The observations of photons from the BL Lac object Mk501 with energies above 10 TeV and of cosmic rays with energies above the GZK threshold appear to be inconsistent with conventional theories. Remarkably, among the recent new-physics proposals of solutions of these threshold paradoxes a prominent role has been played by proposals based on quantum properties of space-time. While the experimental evidence (and theory work attempting to interpret it) is much too preliminary to justify any serious hopes that we might have stumbled upon the first manifestation of a "quantum gravity", the fact that for the first time phenomenological models involving quantum-gravity ideas are competing on level ground with other new-physics proposals clearly marks the beginning of a new stage of quantum-gravity research. I emphasize one important aspect of this new phenomenology: combining the determination…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
