Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into QND interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics

TL;DR

This paper proposes modifications to LIGO-like interferometers using input/output optics to surpass the standard quantum limit, potentially increasing gravitational wave detection rates significantly.

Contribution

It introduces three novel interferometer designs employing frequency-dependent squeezing and homodyne detection to beat the SQL.

Findings

Interferometers can beat the SQL by factors of 3 to 5.

Event detection rates could increase by 30 to 100 times.

Feasible with anticipated technology and current laser powers.

Abstract

The LIGO-II gravitational-wave interferometers (ca. 2006--2008) are designed to have sensitivities at about the standard quantum limit (SQL) near 100 Hz. This paper describes and analyzes possible designs for subsequent, LIGO-III interferometers that can beat the SQL. These designs are identical to a conventional broad-band interferometer (without signal recycling), except for new input and/or output optics. Three designs are analyzed: (i) a "squeezed-input interferometer" (conceived by Unruh based on earlier work of Caves) in which squeezed vacuum with frequency-dependent (FD) squeeze angle is injected into the interferometer's dark port; (ii) a "variational-output" interferometer (conceived in a different form by Vyatchanin, Matsko and Zubova), in which homodyne detection with FD homodyne phase is performed on the output light; and (iii) a "squeezed-variational interferometer" with squeezed input and FD-homodyne output. It is shown that the FD squeezed-input light can be produced by sending ordinary squeezed light through two successive Fabry-Perot filter cavities before injection into the interferometer, and FD-homodyne detection can be achieved by sending the output light through two filter cavities before ordinary homodyne detection. With anticipated technology and with laser powers comparable to that planned for LIGO-II, these interferometers can beat the amplitude SQL by factors in the range from 3 to 5, corresponding to event rate increases between ~30 and ~100 over the rate for a SQL-limited interferometer.