Stability of self-gravitating magnetic monopoles

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the stability of self-gravitating magnetic monopoles using a thin wall approximation, revealing conditions for static, collapsing, and inflating solutions, and their relation to black hole formation.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed stability analysis of magnetic monopoles in a gravitational setting, identifying the parameter regimes for various solution types including static, collapsing, and inflating configurations.

Findings

Existence of unique static solutions for fixed parameters.

Bound on stable radial excitations with mass less than charge.

Black hole formation occurs when mass exceeds charge.

Abstract

The stability of a spherically symmetric self-gravitating magnetic monopole is examined in the thin wall approximation: modeling the interior false vacuum as a region of de Sitter space; the exterior as an asymptotically flat region of the Reissner-Nordstr\"om geometry; and the boundary separating the two as a charged domain wall. There remains only to determine how the wall gets embedded in these two geometries. In this approximation, the ratio $k$ of the false vacuum to surface energy densities is a measure of the symmetry breaking scale $\eta$. Solutions are characterized by this ratio, the charge on the wall $Q$, and the value of the conserved total energy $M$. We find that for each fixed $k$ and $Q$ up to some critical value, there exists a unique globally static solution, with $M\simeq Q^{3/2}$; any stable radial excitation has $M$ bounded above by $Q$, the value assumed in an extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om geometry and these are the only solutions with $M<Q$. As $M$ is raised above $Q$ a black hole forms in the exterior: (i) for low $Q$ or $k$, the wall is crushed; (ii) for higher values, it oscillates inside the black hole. If the mass is not too high these `collapsing' solutions co-exist with an inflating bounce; (iii) for $k$, $Q$ or $M$ outside the above regimes, there is a unique inflating solution. In case (i) the course of the bounce lies within a single asymptotically flat region (AFR) and it resembles closely the bounce exhibited by a false vacuum bubble (with Q=0). In cases (ii) and (iii) the course of the bounce spans two consecutive AFRs.