How does the electromagnetic field couple to gravity, in particular to metric, nonmetricity, torsion, and curvature?
Friedrich W. Hehl, Yuri N. Obukhov

TL;DR
This paper explores how electromagnetic fields interact with various geometric aspects of gravity, such as metric, nonmetricity, torsion, and curvature, especially in the context of alternative gravitational theories and experimental tests.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the different mechanisms and theories describing electromagnetic coupling to diverse gravitational structures, including non-minimal and non-local couplings.
Findings
Electrodynamics based on charge and flux conservation does not inherently couple to gravity.
The coupling occurs through constitutive laws relating excitation and field strength.
Various coupling schemes, including non-minimal and non-local, are discussed.
Abstract
The coupling of the electromagnetic field to gravity is an age-old problem. Presently, there is a resurgence of interest in it, mainly for two reasons: (i) Experimental investigations are under way with ever increasing precision, be it in the laboratory or by observing outer space. (ii) One desires to test out alternatives to Einstein's gravitational theory, in particular those of a gauge-theoretical nature, like Einstein-Cartan theory or metric-affine gravity. A clean discussion requires a reflection on the foundations of electrodynamics. If one bases electrodynamics on the conservation laws of electric charge and magnetic flux, one finds Maxwell's equations expressed in terms of the excitation H=(D,H) and the field strength F=(E,B) without any intervention of the metric or the linear connection of spacetime. In other words, there is still no coupling to gravity. Only the constitutive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
