Symmetries and conservation laws in histories-based theories
Tulsi Dass, Y. N. Joglekar (Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur,, India)

TL;DR
This paper develops a formalism for symmetries and conservation laws in histories-based theories, generalizing traditional concepts to include quasitemporal structures and applying them to curved spacetimes.
Contribution
It introduces a classification of symmetries in histories theories, establishes criteria for physical equivalence, and proves a Noether-type theorem within this framework.
Findings
Symmetries are classified into orthochronous and nonorthochronous.
A criterion for physical equivalence of histories is formulated.
A Noether-type theorem relating symmetries and conservation laws is proved.
Abstract
Symmetries are defined in histories-based theories paying special attention to the class of history theories admitting quasitemporal structure (a generalization of the concept of `temporal sequences' of `events' using partial semigroups) and logic structure for `single-time histories'. Symmetries are classified into orthochronous (those preserving the `temporal order' of `events') and nonorthochronous. A straightforward criterion for physical equivalence of histories is formulated in terms of orthochronous symmetries; this criterion covers various notions of physical equivalence of histories considered by Gell-Mann and Hartle as special cases. In familiar situations, a reciprocal relationship between traditional symmetries (Wigner symmetries in quantum mechanics and Borel-measurable transformations of phase space in classical mechanics) and symmetries defined in this work is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
