Two Approaches to Non-Commutative Geometry
Vladimir V. Kisil

TL;DR
This paper explores two historical approaches to geometry—algebraic and group-theoretic—and discusses their modern interpretations in non-commutative geometry, highlighting their interconnectedness and relevance to quantum mechanics.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of algebraic and group-theoretic methods in non-commutative geometry, emphasizing their historical roots and modern applications.
Findings
Algebraic and group-theoretic approaches are interconnected through Galois.
Modern non-commutative geometry bridges these approaches with quantum mechanics.
Connections between various mathematical objects are discussed in the context of non-commutative geometry.
Abstract
Looking to the history of mathematics one could find out two outer approaches to Geometry. First one (algebraic) is due to Descartes and second one (group-theoretic)--to Klein. We will see that they are not rivalling but are tied (by Galois). We also examine their modern life as philosophies of non-commutative geometry. Connections between different objects (see keywords) are discussed. Keywords: Heisenberg group, Weyl commutation relation, Manin plain, quantum groups, SL(2, R), Hardy space, Bergman space, Segal-Bargmann space, Szeg"o projection, Bergman projection, Clifford analysis, Cauchy-Riemann-Dirac operator, Moebius transformations, functional calculus, Weyl calculus (quantization), Berezin quantization, Wick ordering, quantum mechanics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Mathematics and Applications
