
TL;DR
This paper critically examines the assumptions behind Cox's Theorem, exploring various strong and arguably unnatural sets of conditions under which the theorem can be proved.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the assumptions required for Cox's Theorem and presents alternative sets of assumptions for its proof.
Findings
Identifies the strength and unnaturalness of common assumptions
Proposes alternative assumption sets for Cox's Theorem
Highlights limitations of existing proofs
Abstract
The assumptions needed to prove Cox's Theorem are discussed and examined. Various sets of assumptions under which a Cox-style theorem can be proved are provided, although all are rather strong and, arguably, not natural.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Probability and Statistical Research · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
