Self-Specifying Machines
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel, and Gerd Wechsung

TL;DR
This paper explores self-specifying machines, revealing their computational power aligns with certain reductions to NP and P sets, and discusses conditions under which these classes coincide.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of self-specifying machines and characterizes their language acceptance power through reductions to NP and P sets, linking it to complexity class equalities.
Findings
Self-specifying machines accept languages reducible to NP and P sets.
The classes coincide if and only if a specific complexity class equality holds.
The work connects machine self-specification with classical complexity class relationships.
Abstract
We study the computational power of machines that specify their own acceptance types, and show that they accept exactly the languages that -reduce to NP sets. A natural variant accepts exactly the languages that -reduce to P sets. We show that these two classes coincide if and only if , where the latter class denotes the sets acceptable via at most one question to followed by at most a constant number of questions to .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
