Raising NP Lower Bounds to Parallel NP Lower Bounds
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Joerg Rothe

TL;DR
This paper surveys recent progress in proving that many natural and longstanding problems are hard for classes with parallel access to NP, extending Wagner's toolkit to broader problem classes.
Contribution
It introduces new techniques to establish parallel NP-hardness for natural problems previously known only to be NP-hard or coNP-hard.
Findings
Natural problems like Minimum Equivalent Expression are shown to be parallel NP-hard.
Progress in proving hardness for problems related to election systems and heuristics.
Extension of Wagner's toolkit to broader classes of problems.
Abstract
A decade ago, a beautiful paper by Wagner developed a ``toolkit'' that in certain cases allows one to prove problems hard for parallel access to NP. However, the problems his toolkit applies to most directly are not overly natural. During the past year, problems that previously were known only to be NP-hard or coNP-hard have been shown to be hard even for the class of sets solvable via parallel access to NP. Many of these problems are longstanding and extremely natural, such as the Minimum Equivalent Expression problem (which was the original motivation for creating the polynomial hierarchy), the problem of determining the winner in the election system introduced by Lewis Carroll in 1876, and the problem of determining on which inputs heuristic algorithms perform well. In the present article, we survey this recent progress in raising lower bounds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Formal Methods in Verification
