Is Word Sense Disambiguation just one more NLP task?
Yorick Wilks

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the relationship between POS tagging and WSD, arguing they are fundamentally different tasks and advocating for the reintegration of related sub-tasks in evaluation methods.
Contribution
It challenges the common view that WSD is just a finer-grained POS task and calls for a unified approach to evaluating related NLP sub-tasks.
Findings
POS and WSD are fundamentally different tasks.
There is no sense of novelty in POS that corresponds to WSD.
Reintegrating sub-tasks can improve evaluation and understanding.
Abstract
This paper compares the tasks of part-of-speech (POS) tagging and word-sense-tagging or disambiguation (WSD), and argues that the tasks are not related by fineness of grain or anything like that, but are quite different kinds of task, particularly becuase there is nothing in POS corresponding to sense novelty. The paper also argues for the reintegration of sub-tasks that are being separated for evaluation
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling
